🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam decision, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to use a newly configured congressional district plan that may create up to five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 order, released on Thursday, grants a request by the state to set aside a district court's block that had rejected the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The district court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its ruling.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters according to their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the new maps. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

In a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, observing that its decision was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The court's action occurs during a nationwide contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican hold. Ordinarily, map-drawing occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several more conservative seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State attorney general praised the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures representation favorable to the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

Conversely, Democratic officials decried the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

Another leading House leader stated the court had another time eroded its standing by approving a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.